<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Heroes Never Die - Latest Comments</title><link>http://drjtumblr.disqus.com/</link><description>Dr J's Tumblr</description><atom:link href="https://drjtumblr.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:47:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/18497569033</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/18497569033#comment-452459080</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks about right :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:47:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/13550087977</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/13550087977#comment-376037340</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree entirely.  I suffer from this very same issue today in a code based I am focused on.  While I am no expert and can do lots of things "ok", when it comes to HAML I am screwed because to be it is like rocket science, and I've never begun to focus on understanding just how to read it enough.  So, when I want to make a slight change and quick deploy here and there, I am basically risking a lot, and this sucks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Rowan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:20:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/12977266808</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/12977266808#comment-367821220</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At least they still trust that full body scanners are safe...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Simpson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:28:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroes Never Die's Tumblelog</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/20387123#comment-367010791</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sports betting had been an age-old tradition found in every society. If you glance back&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;into the history you will find that gamblers use to bet their money on just about anything&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;unpredictable like games, animal racing or combats. The trend continues even today and&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;betting is an interesting indulgence for sports fans and bookies all over the world.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sports betting in case popular games like soccer or baseball is carried out only during&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;their seasons.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mma fight</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:52:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroes Never Die's Tumblelog</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/20387123#comment-367010116</link><description>&lt;p&gt; &lt;br&gt;Even if you are betting directly, you will have to depend on such sites to get real-time updates from bookies who have years of experience to their credit. If you are new in the business of sports betting then it is advisable to observe others before making your own moves.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mma fight</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:51:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/9665077061</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/9665077061#comment-300352496</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i do that in my sleep&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sam Saccone</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 09:27:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/6142328864</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/6142328864#comment-223954947</link><description>&lt;p&gt;haha cool video, this little guy is an awesome actor !!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yamm Software</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:03:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/6387739567</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/6387739567#comment-223316383</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you cut us out of the shot on purpose :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Simpson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:03:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/4044385990</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/4044385990#comment-170320646</link><description>&lt;p&gt;#3&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anna</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:58:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/4044385990</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/4044385990#comment-170297094</link><description>&lt;p&gt;#3.  though I'm a fan of the no frame ones.  At least my last pair had no lower frames.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Krause</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:44:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/4044385990</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/4044385990#comment-170254391</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I vote # 3.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Jolicoeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:08:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/4044385990</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/4044385990#comment-170137240</link><description>&lt;p&gt;3, although if I were looking for this kind of advice, I'd either go to my wife or Danny Chapman before I'd trust my own opinion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I realize that sounds weird, but you'll understand soon enough.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Alba</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:42:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/4044385990</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/4044385990#comment-170101022</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm liking #1 and #2... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Faulk</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:25:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: British Columbia Bans Affliction Clothing</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/13363250#comment-155788315</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In doing so, he further reduced the estimate of affliction to 5.4 percent. If nothing else, this analytic sequence--from the NVVRS, to the Columbia reevaluation, and to the McNally recalibration--serves as an object lesson in the definitional fluidity ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hypnosis gold coast</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 03:46:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: British Columbia Bans Affliction Clothing</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/13363250#comment-155781651</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And in Ottawa Wednesday, Vancouver Quadra MP Joyce Murray said that her private members' bill seeking a ban on oil-tanker traffic off BC's coast will proceed to debate in the House of Commons next month.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pennystocks</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 03:02:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: British Columbia Bans Affliction Clothing</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/13363250#comment-155323336</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Canada's three western premiers are urging Prime Minister Stephen Harper to defeat an opposition bill that would ban oil tanker traffic on British Columbia's north coast, saying it would kill pipeline plans meant to open up the region's energy markets. ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">watch limitless online</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 08:55:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: British Columbia Bans Affliction Clothing</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/13363250#comment-148185402</link><description>&lt;p&gt;An Iranian prisoner in British Columbia filed a lawsuit against the province for removing his teeth without permission. He also asked correction officials to pay for his new dentures, but the province has refused. Because of his missing teeth, ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pills to help get pregnant</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 23:44:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/441211566</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/441211566#comment-42680683</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can't agree with you more, may I add a toe tap two with the right foot, then two with the left.  I'm alwaying looking towards the spring season. The last few years have been a surprises to where he's gonna play.  So this year was a wait but not a complete surprise.  But I still can't say a disappointment.  I would still have loved to see him play, I can't stand listening to those out there who say he was to week.  My point is he was just a great player over the entire 14yrs and he amazing to watch.. Nomar you will be missed&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kimberlyfleury</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 09:09:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroes Never Die</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/96171785#comment-8203200</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, things have really changed in the 8 yrs since I last tried capturing OBD data.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hybernaut</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:30:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroes Never Die</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/85300720#comment-7078841</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That is freakin' awesome!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hybernaut</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:21:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Idiots</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/83461841#comment-6876909</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This remains one of my biggest usability pet peeves!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Winfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:56:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Idiots</title><link>http://tumblr.craigjolicoeur.com/post/83461841#comment-6870826</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Back in the day, you couldn't just claim something on the Internet was valid without quotin' an RFC. These days Wikipedia is the shortcut:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_address#Sub-addressing" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_address#Sub-addressing"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The problem with plus sub-addressing is that it's an MUA feature, and not functionally specified in RFC 5322, which defines email address formats.  &lt;a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.2.3" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.2.3"&gt;RFC 5322 3.2.3&lt;/a&gt; lists the following as valid characters for the local-part of an email address:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;br&gt;   atext           =   ALPHA / DIGIT /    ; Printable US-ASCII&lt;br&gt;                       "!" / "#" /        ;  characters not including&lt;br&gt;                       "$" / "%" /        ;  specials.  Used for atoms.&lt;br&gt;                       "&amp;amp;" / "'" /&lt;br&gt;                       "*" / "+" /&lt;br&gt;                       "-" / "/" /&lt;br&gt;                       "=" / "?" /&lt;br&gt;                       "^" / "_" /&lt;br&gt;                       "`" / "{" /&lt;br&gt;                       "|" / "}" /&lt;br&gt;                       "~"&lt;br&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The definition of sub-addressing is in &lt;a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5233" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5233"&gt;RFC 5233&lt;/a&gt;, "Sieve Email Filtering: Subaddress Extension".  That one's pretty obscure, and you always find 5322 if you go looking for the format definition.  But of course web developers don't read RFCs, they just copy magickal regexp incantations that they find on the Google.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hybernaut</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:18:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>